banner



Home  ›  What Are Some Acquired Traits In Animals

What Are Some Acquired Traits In Animals

Written By Friday, May 20, 2022 Add Comment Edit

Differences in the mental functions and behaviors of the sexes

Sex differences in psychology are differences in the mental functions and behaviors of the sexes and are due to a complex interplay of biological, developmental, and cultural factors. Differences take been found in a variety of fields such every bit mental health, cerebral abilities, personality, emotion, sexuality, and trend towards aggression. Such variation may exist innate, learned, or both. Modern research attempts to distinguish between these causes and to analyze any ethical concerns raised. Since beliefs is a result of interactions between nature and nurture, researchers are interested in investigating how biological science and environs interact to produce such differences,[1] [ii] although this is often not possible.[2] : 36

A number of factors combine to influence the development of sex activity differences, including genetics and epigenetics;[iii] differences in brain structure and function;[four] hormones,[5] and socialization.[1] [two] [six] [ page needed ]

The formation of gender is controversial in many scientific fields, including psychology. Specifically, researchers and theorists take different perspectives on how much of gender is due to biological, neurochemical, and evolutionary factors (nature), or is the result of culture and socialization (nurture). This is known as the nature versus nurture fence.

Definition [edit]

Psychological sexual practice differences refer to emotional, motivational, or cerebral differences between the sexes.[7] [6] Examples include greater male person tendencies toward violence,[eight] or greater female person empathy.

The terms "sex activity differences" and "gender differences" are at times used interchangeably, sometimes to refer to differences in male and female person behaviors as either biological ("sex differences") or environmental/cultural ("gender differences").[2] : 35–36 This distinction is oft difficult to make due to challenges in determining whether a departure is biological or environmental/cultural.[2]

Gender is generally conceived as a gear up of characteristics or traits that are associated with a sure biological sex (male or female). The characteristics that mostly define gender are referred to as masculine or feminine. In some cultures, gender is non always conceived as binary, or strictly linked to biological sex. As a result, in some cultures in that location are third, quaternary,[9] or "some"[10] : 23 genders.

History [edit]

Behavior about sex differences take likely existed throughout history.[ii] : 2

In his 1859 book On the Origin of Species, Charles Darwin proposed that, like concrete traits, psychological traits evolve through the process of sexual selection:[ verification needed ]

In the afar time to come I see open fields for far more important researches. Psychology volition be based on a new foundation, that of the necessary revenue of each mental power and chapters by gradation.

—Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species, 1859, p. 449.

Two of his after books, The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex (1871) and The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals (1872) explore the subject area of psychological differences between the sexes. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex includes 70 pages on sexual option in homo evolution, some of which concerns psychological traits.[11]

The study of gender took off in the 1970s. During this time menses, academic works were published reflecting the irresolute views of researchers towards gender studies. Some of these works included textbooks, equally they were an of import manner that information was compiled and made sense of the new field. In 1978 Women and sex roles: A social psychological perspective was published, 1 of the first textbooks on the psychology behind women and sex roles.[12] Another textbook to be published, Gender and Communication, was the first textbook to discuss the topic of its subject field.[13]

Other influential academic works focused on the development of gender. In 1966, The Development of Sex Differences was published. This book went into what factors influence a kid'southward gender evolution, with contributors proposing the effects of hormones, social learning, and cognitive evolution in respective chapters. Man and Woman, Boy and Girl, past John Coin was published in 1972, reporting findings of enquiry done with intersex subjects. The book proposed that the social environs a child grows up in is more important in determining gender than the genetic factors he or she inherits. The bulk of Money's theories regarding the importance of socialization in the decision of gender have come under intense criticism, especially in connection with the inaccurate reporting of success in the infant sex reassignment of David Reimer.[14]

In 1974, The Psychology of Sex Differences was published. It said that men and women behave more similarly than had been previously supposed. They as well proposed that children have much power over what gender function they grow into, whether by choosing which parent to imitate, or doing activities such equally playing with action figures or dolls.[12] These works added new cognition to the field of gender psychology.

Psychological traits [edit]

Personality traits [edit]

Cantankerous-cultural research has shown population-level gender differences on the tests measuring sociability and emotionality. For example, on the scales measured by the Big V personality traits women consistently report higher neuroticism, conjuration, warmth and openness to feelings, and men oft written report higher assertiveness and openness to ideas.[fifteen] Nevertheless, there is meaning overlap in all these traits, so an private woman may, for example, have lower neuroticism than the bulk of men.[16] Reverse to evolutionary theories of personality, which would result in stable differences across cultures, the size of the differences varied between cultures.[15]

Across cultures, gender differences in personality traits are largest in prosperous, good for you, and egalitarian cultures in which women have more opportunities that are equal to those of men.[17] Differences in the magnitude of sex differences between more or less developed globe regions were due to differences betwixt men, not women, in these respective regions.[17] That is, men in highly developed globe regions were less neurotic, extroverted, careful and agreeable compared to men in less developed world regions. Women, on the other hand tended not to differ in personality traits beyond regions.[17] [17]

A personality trait direct linked to emotion and empathy where gender differences exist (come across below) is scored on the Machiavellianism scale. Individuals who score high on this dimension are emotionally absurd; this allows them to detach from others equally well as values, and act egoistically rather than driven past bear upon, empathy or morality. In big samples of United states of america college students, males are on boilerplate more Machiavellian than females; in particular, males are over-represented among very high Machiavellians, while females are overrepresented amid low Machiavellians.[eighteen] A 2014 meta-assay by researchers Rebecca Friesdorf and Paul Conway found that men score significantly higher on narcissism than women and this finding is robust across past literature.[xix] The meta-assay included 355 studies measuring narcissism across participants from the U.s., Deutschland, Cathay, Netherlands, Italia, UK, Hong Kong, Singapore, Switzerland, Norway, Sweden, Commonwealth of australia and Belgium likewise as measuring latent factors from 124 boosted studies.[19] The researchers noted that gender differences in narcissism is not just a measurement antiquity merely also represents true differences in the latent personality traits such as men'southward heightened sense of entitlement and authority.[nineteen]

Males on boilerplate are more than assertive and have higher self-esteem. Females were on average college than males in extraversion, anxiety, trust, and, particularly, tender-mindedness (e.1000., nurturance).[20]

Men prefer working with things, and women prefer working with people. When interests were classified by RIASEC type Holland Codes (Realistic, Investigative, Artistic, Social, Enterprising, Conventional), men showed stronger Realistic and Investigative interests, and women showed stronger Artistic, Social, and Conventional interests. Sexual practice differences favoring men were too constitute for more specific measures of engineering, scientific discipline, and mathematics interests.[21]

Emotion [edit]

When measured with an touch on intensity measure out, women reported greater intensity of both positive and negative bear upon than men. Women also reported a more than intense and more frequent feel of affect, joy, and dear but also experienced more embarrassment, guilt, shame, sadness, anger, fear, and distress. Experiencing pride was more frequent and intense for men than for women.[22] [ page needed ] In imagined frightening situations, such equally being dwelling alone and witnessing a stranger walking towards your firm, women reported greater fear. Women also reported more fear in situations that involved "a male person's hostile and aggressive behavior".[22] : 281 Emotional contagion refers to the phenomenon of a person's emotions condign similar to those of surrounding people. Women have been reported to be more responsive to this.[23]

There are documented differences in socialization that could contribute to sexual practice differences in emotion and to differences in patterns of encephalon activity.[ commendation needed ]

Context also determines a man or woman's emotional behavior. Context-based emotion norms, such as feeling rules or display rules, "prescribe emotional experience and expressions in specific situations like a wedding or a funeral", may be independent of the person'due south gender. In situations similar a hymeneals or a funeral, the activated emotion norms apply to and constrain every person in the situation. Gender differences are more pronounced when situational demands are very small or non-real besides as in ambiguous situations. During these situations, gender norms "are the default selection that prescribes emotional behavior".[22] : 290–i

Professor of Psychology Ann Kring said[ when? ], "It is wrong to make a blanket statement that women are more emotional than men, information technology is right to say that women evidence their emotions more than men." In two studies by Kring, women were institute to exist more facially expressive than men when it came to both positive and negative emotions. These researchers concluded that women and men experience the same amount of emotion, but that women are more likely to express their emotions.[24] [ better source needed ]

Women are known to have anatomically differently shaped tear glands than men likewise as having more of the hormone prolactin, which is nowadays in tear glands, as adults. While girls and boys cry at roughly the same corporeality at age 12, past age 18, women generally cry four times more men, which could be explained by college levels of prolactin.[25]

Empathy [edit]

Current literature notice that women demonstrate more than empathy beyond studies.[26] Women perform better than men in tests involving emotional interpretation, such as understanding facial expressions, and empathy.[27] [28] [29] [30]

Some studies argue that this is related to the subject's perceived gender identity and gendered expectations influencing the subject'south implicit gender stereotypes.[31] Additionally, culture impacts gender differences in the expression of emotions. This may exist explained past the dissimilar social roles women and men have in different cultures, and by the status and power men and women hold in different societies, as well as the dissimilar cultural values various societies agree.[22] [ page needed ] Some studies take found no differences in empathy betwixt women and men, and suggest that perceived gender differences are the result of motivational differences.[32] Some researchers debate that considering differences in empathy disappear on tests where information technology is not articulate that empathy is being studied, men and women practice not differ in ability, but instead in how empathetic they would like to announced to themselves and others.[31]

Women are better at recognizing facial effects, expression processing and emotions in full general.[33] Men were only better at recognizing specific behaviour which includes anger, aggression and threatening cues.[33] Small but statistically meaning sex differences favour females in "Reading of the mind" test. "Reading of the heed" examination is an ability measure of theory of mind or cerebral empathy.[34] Overall, females have an reward in not-exact emotional recognition.[35]

There are some sex differences in empathy from birth which remains consistent and stable across lifespan.[26] Females were plant to have college empathy than males while children with college empathy regardless of gender continue to be higher in empathy throughout evolution.[26] Farther analysis of brain tools such as event related potentials found that females who saw human suffering had higher ERP waveforms than males.[26] Another investigation with like encephalon tools such as N400 amplitudes plant higher N400 in females in response to social situations which positively correlated with self-reported empathy.[26] Structural fMRI studies found females have larger gray matter volumes in posterior inferior frontal and anterior junior parietal cortex areas which are correlated with mirror neurons in fMRI literature.[26] Females were too found to have stronger link between emotional and cognitive empathy.[26] The researchers found that the stability of these sex differences in evolution are unlikely to be explained past whatever environment influences but rather might take some roots in homo development and inheritance.[26]

An evolutionary explanation for the difference is that understanding and tracking relationships and reading others' emotional states was specially important for women in prehistoric societies for tasks such as caring for children and social networking.[6] Throughout prehistory, females nurtured and were the primary caretakers of children so this might have led to an evolved neurological adaptation for women to be more aware and responsive to non-verbal expressions. Co-ordinate to the Chief Caretaker Hypothesis, prehistoric males did not have aforementioned selective pressure level as primary caretakers so therefore this might explain modernistic mean solar day sex activity differences in emotion recognition and empathy.[36]

Aggression [edit]

Although enquiry on sex activity differences in aggression show that males are generally more likely to brandish aggression than females, how much of this is due to social factors and gender expectations is unclear. Assailment is closely linked with cultural definitions of "masculine" and "feminine". In some situations, women show equal or more than aggression than men, although less concrete; for case, women are more probable to employ direct aggression in individual, where other people cannot see them and are more probable to use indirect aggression in public.[37] Men are more probable to exist the targets of displays of aggression and provocation than females. Studies past Bettencourt and Miller show that when provocation is controlled for, sexual practice differences in aggression are profoundly reduced. They argue that this shows that gender-role norms play a large office in the differences in aggressive behavior between men and women.[38]

Sex differences in aggression are one of the most robust and oldest findings in psychology.[39] Males regardless of age engaged in more physical and verbal aggression while modest effect for females engaging in more indirect aggression such as rumor spreading or gossiping.[39] Males tend to engage in more unprovoked aggression at college frequency than females.[39] This greater male aggression is also present in childhood and adolescence.[40] The difference is greater in the physical type of assailment, compared to the verbal type.[41] Males are more likely to cyber-bully than females.[42] Difference as well showed that females reported more than cyberbullying behaviour during mid-adolescence, while males showed more cyber bullying behaviour at late adolescence.[42]

In humans, males engage in crime and especially trigger-happy criminal offense more than than females. The human relationship between testosterone and aggression is unclear, and a causal link has non been conclusively shown.[43] [44] Some studies indicate that testosterone levels may be affected by ecology and social influences.[45] The relationship is difficult to study since the only reliable measure of brain testosterone is from a lumbar puncture which is not washed for research purposes and many studies have instead used less reliable measures such as claret testosterone.[ commendation needed ] Involvement in criminal offense usually rises in the early teens to mid teens, which happen at the same time as testosterone levels rise. Virtually studies back up a link between adult criminality and testosterone, although the relationship is small-scale if examined separately for each sexual practice. However, nearly all studies of juvenile delinquency and testosterone are non significant. Almost studies have too institute testosterone to be associated with behaviors or personality traits linked with criminality such as antisocial behavior and alcoholism.[46]

In species that accept loftier levels of male physical competition and aggression over females, males tend to be larger and stronger than females. Humans have small-scale general torso sexual dimorphism on characteristics such as height and trunk mass. Nonetheless, this may understate the sexual dimorphism regarding characteristics related to aggression since females have large fat stores. The sex differences are greater for muscle mass and specially for upper body muscle mass. Men's skeleton, specially in the vulnerable face, is more than robust. Some other possible explanation, instead of intra-species aggression, for this sexual dimorphism may be that it is an adaption for a sexual sectionalization of labor with males doing the hunting. However, the hunting theory may take difficulty explaining differences regarding features such as stronger protective skeleton, beards (not helpful in hunting, only they increase the perceived size of the jaws and perceived dominance, which may be helpful in intra-species male contest), and greater male ability at interception (greater targeting ability tin exist explained by hunting).[47]

Ethics and morality [edit]

Sex activity differences of moral orientation discover that women tend towards a more care-based morality while men tend towards a more justice-based morality.[48] This is usually based on the fact that men have slightly more utilitarian reasoning while women have more deontological reasoning which is largely considering of greater female affective response and rejection of harm-based behaviours.[49] Women have greater moral sensitivity than men.[50] Using the v moral principles of care, fairness, loyalty, authorization, and purity (based on moral foundations theory), women consistently score higher on intendance, fairness, and purity across 67 cultures.[51] On the other hand, sex differences in loyalty and authorization were small in size and highly variable beyond cultural contexts. Country-level sex differences in all moral foundations in relation to cultural, socioeconomic, and gender-related indicators reveal that global sex differences in moral foundations are larger in individualistic, Western, and gender-equal cultures.[51]

Cognitive traits [edit]

Sexual practice-related differences of cognitive performance is questioned in inquiry done on the areas of perception, attention, reasoning, thinking, problem solving, memory, learning, language and emotion.[52] Cognitive testing on the sexes involves written tests that typically have a fourth dimension limit, the most common form being a standardized test such as the Sabbatum or Act. These exam basic private abilities rather than complex combination of abilities needed to solve real life issues.[53] Analysis of the research has institute a lack of credibility when relying on published studies about cognition because most contain findings of cognitive differences between the males and females, merely they overlook those that do not show any differences, creating a puddle of biased data. Those differences found are attributed to both social and biological factors.[52]

It was once thought that sex differences in cognitive task and problem solving did not occur until puberty. However, as of 2000, evidence suggested that cognitive and skill differences are present earlier in development. For example, researchers accept constitute that three- and four-twelvemonth-sometime boys were better at targeting and at mentally rotating figures within a clock face than girls of the same age. Prepubescent girls, however, excelled at recalling lists of words. These sex differences in noesis represent to patterns of power rather than overall intelligence. Laboratory settings are used to systematically study the sexual dimorphism in trouble solving chore performed past adults.[53]

On average, females excel relative to males on tests that measure recollection. They have an advantage on processing speed involving messages, digits and rapid naming tasks.[54] Females tend to take better object location memory and exact retentivity.[55] They also perform ameliorate at verbal learning.[56] Females take better functioning at matching items and precision tasks, such equally placing pegs into designated holes. In maze and path completion tasks, males learn the goal route in fewer trials than females, only females think more than of the landmarks presented. This suggests that females use landmarks in everyday situations to orient themselves more than than males. Females were better at remembering whether objects had switched places or non.[53]

On average, males excel relative to females at sure spatial tasks. Specifically, males have an advantage in tests that require the mental rotation or manipulation of an object.[57] In a figurer simulation of a maze job, males completed the task faster and with fewer errors than their female counterparts. Additionally, males accept displayed higher accuracy in tests of targeted motor skills, such as guiding projectiles.[53] Males are too faster on reaction time and finger borer tests.[54]

Doreen Kimura, a psychobiologist, has published books and manufactures specifically on the discipline of sex and cognition. Since studying gender differences in knowledge, Kimura has further proved generalizations fabricated from inquiry information nerveless in the field of cerebral psychology.[53] These scientific findings have not been generalized cross culturally.[53] Females have shown to accept a higher power in reading facial and body cues than their male counterparts. Though studies have found females to accept more avant-garde verbal skills, men and women in adulthood practice not have varied vocabularies. Women tend to have better spelling capabilities and exact memory.[53]

Intelligence [edit]

An article published in the Review of Educational Research summarizes the history of the controversy around sex activity differences in variability of intelligence. Through modern inquiry, the primary idea has held that males take a much wider range in test performance in IQ tests. The study also analyzes information concerning differences in central tendencies through environmental and biological theories. Males were found to accept much wider variation than females in areas of quantitative reasoning, spatial visualization, spelling, and general knowledge than females. In the studies decision, to form an accurate summary, both the variability in sex differences and in the central tendencies must exist examined to generalize the cognitive variances of males and females.[58]

Empirical studies of 1000, or general intelligence, in men and women accept given inconsistent results, showing either no differences or advantages for either sexual practice.[ citation needed ] The differences in average IQ betwixt women and men are small in magnitude and inconsistent in direction.[59] [60] [61] [62]

There accept been many studies where this upshot has been looked into. Scientists have found that a mindset of differing intelligence is even so prominent in many cultures. Databases like ProQuest Central, PsycINFO, and Web of Science were searched for more than information on this topic. This resulted in a total of 71 studies that show a diversity of gender inequalities across the world. [63]

According to the 1995 report Intelligence: Knowns and Unknowns by the American Psychological Association, "Most standard tests of intelligence accept been synthetic so that there are no overall score differences between females and males."[59] Arthur Jensen in 1998 conducted studies on sex differences in intelligence through tests that were "loaded heavily on yard" but were not normalized to eliminate sex activity differences. He ended, "No testify was found for sex differences in the hateful level of g. Males, on average, excel on some factors; females on others". Jensen's results that no overall sex differences existed for yard has been strengthened past researchers who assessed this event with a battery of 42 mental ability tests and found no overall sex activity departure.[64]

Although nearly of the tests showed no difference, in that location were some that did. For example, some tests found females performed better on verbal abilities while males performed meliorate on visuospatial abilities.[64] One female person advantage is in verbal fluency where they have been found to perform better in vocabulary, reading comprehension, speech product and essay writing.[65] Males accept been specifically found to perform improve on spatial visualization, spatial perception, and mental rotation. Researchers had then recommended that general models such as fluid and crystallized intelligence be divided into verbal, perceptual and visuospatial domains of g, because when this model is applied then females excel at verbal and perceptual tasks while males on visuospatial tasks.[64]

In that location are, however, also differences in the capacity of males and females in performing certain tasks, such equally rotation of objects in infinite, often categorized every bit spatial ability. These differences are more than pronounced when people are exposed to a stereotype threat to their gender, which can exist equally subtle equally beingness asked for their gender before being tested. Differences in mental rotation have besides been seen to correlate with computer experience[66] and video game practice,[67] with as picayune as 10 hours of video game preparation reducing the disparity.[68] Other traditionally male advantages, such as in the field of mathematics are less clear; once again, differences may be caused by stereotype threats to women.[31] Although females have bottom performance in spatial abilities on average, they take meliorate operation in processing speed involving messages, digits and rapid naming tasks,[54] object location memory, verbal retentivity,[55] and likewise verbal learning.[56]

Memory [edit]

The results from inquiry on sex differences in retentivity are mixed and inconsistent, every bit some studies testify no difference, and others show a female or male advantage.[69]

Cerebral control of behavior [edit]

A 2011 meta-analyses plant that women have small, but persistent, advantages in punishment sensitivity and effortful control across cultures.[seventy] A 2014 review institute that in humans, women discount more steeply than men,[ description needed ] just sex differences on measures of impulsive action depend on tasks and bailiwick samples.[71]

Behavior [edit]

Childhood Play [edit]

The differences between males and females in the context of babyhood play is linked to differences in Gender roles. A research on the "conquering of cardinal movement skills" found that even though the level of mastery for certain skills where about the same for both boys and girls, after a certain age boys accept better object control skills than girls exercise.[72]

Some differences in gender roles influence on childhood play are suggested to be biological. A written report by Alexander, Wilcox, and Woods led to the decision that toy preferences are innate. The reason beingness that the infants in the study visually discriminated between dolls and trucks. Where as the girls preferred the dolls over the truck, the boys preferred the trucks.[73]

Hines and Kaufman hypothesized that girls with Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia who are exposed to high androgen levels during pregnancy might be more than physically forceful and rougher similar boys are observed to be when they play.[74] The results of Hines and Kaufman'south research led them to conclude that androgen didn't cause girls with Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia to exist rougher than unaffected girls during play.[75] The report suggested socialization too influenced the type of play children participated in.[76]

Sexual behavior [edit]

Psychological theories exist regarding the development and expression of gender differences in human sexuality. A number of these theories are consistent in predicting that men should be more approving of casual sex (sex happening outside a stable, committed relationship such as marriage) and should also be more than promiscuous (have a higher number of sexual partners) than women.[77]

A sociobiological approach applies evolutionary biology to human sexuality, emphasizing reproductive success in shaping patterns of sexual behavior. According to sociobiologists, since women's parental investment in reproduction is greater than men's, attributable to human sperm being much more plentiful than eggs, and the fact that women must devote considerable free energy to gestating their offspring, women volition tend to be much more than selective in their choice of mates than men. Information technology may not be possible to accurately test sociobiological theories in relation to promiscuity and casual sex in contemporary (U.S.) lodge, which is quite different from the ancestral human societies in which near natural selection for sexual traits has occurred.[77]

Neoanalytic theories are based on the observation that mothers, every bit opposed to fathers, deport the major responsibility for childcare in most families and cultures; both male and female person infants, therefore, class an intense emotional attachment to their mother, a woman. According to feminist psychoanalytic theorist Nancy Chodorow, girls tend to preserve this attachment throughout life and ascertain their identities in relational terms, whereas boys must decline this maternal zipper in order to develop a masculine identity. In add-on, this theory predicts that women's economic dependence on men in a male-dominated club volition tend to cause women to approve of sex activity more in committed relationships providing economical security, and less so in coincidental relationships.[77]

The sexual strategies theory by David Buss and David P. Schmitt is an evolutionary psychology theory regarding female and male short-term and long-term mating strategies which they argued are dependent on several dissimilar goals and vary depending on the environs.[78] [79] [80]

According to social learning theory, sexuality is influenced by people's social environment. This theory suggests that sexual attitudes and behaviors are learned through observation of role models such as parents and media figures, equally well as through positive or negative reinforcements for behaviors that match or defy established gender roles. It predicts that gender differences in sexuality can change over fourth dimension equally a role of changing social norms, and as well that a societal double standard in punishing women more severely than men (who may in fact be rewarded) for engaging in promiscuous or casual sex will atomic number 82 to meaning gender differences in attitudes and behaviors regarding sexuality.[77]

Such a societal double standard as well figures in social role theory, which suggests that sexual attitudes and behaviors are shaped past the roles that men and women are expected to fill in order, and script theory, which focuses on the symbolic significant of behaviors; this theory suggests that social conventions influence the meaning of specific acts, such as male sexuality being tied more to individual pleasure and macho stereotypes (therefore predicting a high number of casual sexual encounters) and female sexuality being tied more to the quality of a committed relationship.[77]

The ovulatory shift hypothesis is the contested theory that female behaviour and preferences relating to mate selection changes throughout the ovulation cycle. A meta-assay of 58 studies ended that there was no evidence to support this theory.[81] Another meta-analysis found that the hypothesis was only support in regards to short-term allure.[82] Additionally, a 2016 newspaper suggested that any possible changes in preferences during ovulation would be moderated by the relationship quality itself, even to the point of inversion in favor of the female's current partner.[83]

A recent report sought to exam the connexion betwixt electric current fertility status and sociosexual attitudes and desires; the researchers concluded that their hypothesis was not met, meaning they constitute no connectedness betwixt women's fertility status and sociosexual desires or attitudes.[84]

Mental wellness [edit]

Childhood acquit disorder and adult antisocial personality disorder as well as substance use disorders are more mutual in men. Many mood disorders, anxiety disorders, and eating disorders are more mutual in women. One explanation is that men tend to externalize stress while women tend to internalize it. Gender differences vary to some caste for different cultures.[85]

Men and women practice not differ on their overall rates of psychopathology; even so, certain disorders are more prevalent in women, and vice versa. Women have higher rates of anxiety and depression (internalizing disorders) and men have college rates of substance abuse and antisocial disorders (externalizing disorders). Information technology is believed that divisions of power and the responsibilities set upon each sexual activity are critical to this predisposition. Namely, women earn less money than men exercise, they tend to have jobs with less power and autonomy, and women are more responsive to problems of people in their social networks. These three differences tin can contribute to women's predisposition to anxiety and low. It is suggested that socializing practices that encourage high self-regard and mastery would do good the mental health of both women and men.[86]

Anxiety and depression [edit]

1 written report interviewed xviii,572 respondents, aged 18 and over, most 15 phobic symptoms. These symptoms would yield diagnoses based on criteria for agoraphobia, social phobia, and simple phobia. Women had significantly higher prevalence rates of agoraphobia and simple phobia; yet, there were no differences found between men and women in social phobia. The almost common phobias for both women and men involved spiders, bugs, mice, snakes, and heights. The biggest differences between men and women in these disorders were plant on the agoraphobic symptoms of "going out of the business firm alone" and "being lone", and on 2 simple phobic symptoms, involving the fear of "whatsoever harmless or dangerous animal" and "storms", with relatively more women having both phobias. There were no differences in the age of onset, reporting a fright on the phobic level, telling a doctor most symptoms, or the recall of by symptoms.[87]

Women are more likely than men to take low. One 1987 study plant picayune empirical support for several proposed explanations, including biological ones, and argued that when depressed women tend to ruminate which may lower the mood further while men tend to distract themselves with activities. This may develop from women and men being raised differently.[88]

Suicide [edit]

There are also differences regarding gender and suicide. Although females have more than suicide attempts, males are much more than probable to die from suicide.[89]

Schizophrenia [edit]

Women and men are both equally likely at developing symptoms of schizophrenia, merely the onset occurs earlier for men. It has been suggested that sexually dimorphic brain anatomy, the differential effects of estrogens and androgens, and the heavy exposure of male adolescents to alcohol and other toxic substances can atomic number 82 to this earlier onset in men. It is believed that estrogens accept a protective effect against the symptoms of schizophrenia. Although, information technology has been shown that other factors can contribute to the delayed onset and symptoms in women, estrogens have a large issue, equally can be seen during a pregnancy. In pregnancy, estrogen levels are rising in women, so women who take had recurrent acute episodes of schizophrenia did non usually break down. However, afterward pregnancy, when estrogen levels have dropped, women tend to suffer from postpartum psychoses. Likewise, psychotic symptoms are exacerbated when, during the menstrual cycle, estrogen levels are at their lowest. In addition, estrogen treatment has yielded beneficial effects in patients with schizophrenia.[90]

Autism Spectrum Disorder [edit]

The epidemiology of autism spectrum disorder varies amongst males and females. Globally, data isn't available for every individual country, just a worldwide review of epidemiological surveys, constitute a median of 62 out of x,000 people have ASD.[91] Among eight-year-olds in the United States 1 in 44 children have been identified with autism spectrum disorder, only information technology is "iv times more common amidst males than females."[92] Co-ordinate to a research looking at the disparity between the actual prevalence of ASD and what really gets diagnosed, there is a 2:ane ratio of males to females who are undiagnosed. This same statistic suggests that females accept a disadvantage when it comes to existence diagnosed and are underrepresented.[93]

The "farthermost male encephalon" or empathizing–systemizing theory views the autism spectrum as an extreme version of male-female differences regarding systemizing and empathizing abilities.[94] It's used to explain the possible reason why males with ASD score higher on systemizing tests than females with ASD.[95]

Symptom presentation in girls with ASD aren't equally noticeable the way they are in boys. Females are ameliorate able to cope with the symptoms and frequently camouflage to be able to fit in, and accept relationships.[96] Females with ASD are meliorate able to fit in socially, and form relationships with others than boys are.[97] Camouflaging has been suggested to be the cause of females with ASD having more emotional distress when male counterparts commonly had more external social problems.[95]

According to the Female person Protective Effect Hypothesis, for females to develop autism they demand to have acquired a wider range of genetic mutations than their male counterpart.[98]

The imprinted brain hypothesis argues that autism and psychosis are contrasting disorders on a number of different variables and that this is acquired by an unbalanced genomic imprinting favoring paternal genes (autism) or maternal genes (psychosis).[99] [100]

Possible causes [edit]

Both biological and social/environmental factors take been studied for their bear upon on sexual practice differences. Separating biological from environmental effects is hard, and advocates for biological influences generally accept that social factors are also important.[101]

Biological [edit]

Biological differentiation is a fundamental function of homo reproduction. Generally, males take ii dissimilar sex chromosomes, an X and a Y; females have two X chromosomes. The Y chromosome, more than precisely the SRY gene located on it, is what generally determines sexual differentiation. If a Y chromosome with a SRY gene is present, growth is along male lines; it results in the production of testes, which in turn produce testosterone. In addition to physical effects, this prenatal testosterone increases the likeliness of certain "male person" patterns of behavior after birth, though the exact touch and mechanism are non well understood. Parts of the SRY and specific parts of the Y chromosome may also perhaps influence different gender behaviors, but if so, these impacts have not all the same been identified.[102]

Biological perspectives on psychological differentiation often place parallels to the concrete nature of sexual differentiation. These parallels include genetic and hormonal factors that create dissimilar individuals, with the main divergence being the reproductive office. The encephalon controls behavior past individuals, but it is influenced by genes, hormones and development. Evidence has shown that the ways that male and female children become adults is different, and that at that place are variations between the individuals of each sex.[103] [ improve source needed ]

Sexual practice linkage [edit]

Psychological traits tin vary betwixt the sexes through sexual activity-linkage. That is to say, what causes a trait may be related to the chromosomal sex of the individual.[104] In contrast, there are also[105] "sex activity-influenced" (or sexual practice-conditioned) traits, in which the phenotypic manifestation of a gene depends on the sexual activity of the private.[ description needed ] [106] Fifty-fifty in a homozygous dominant or recessive female the condition may non be expressed fully.[ citation needed ] "Sex-limited" traits are characteristics only expressed in one sexual activity. They may be caused past genes on either autosomal or sex chromosomes.[106]

Evidence exists that there are sexual practice-linked differences between the male and female brain.[107]

Epigenetics [edit]

Epigenetic changes take also been plant to cause sex-based differentiation in the brain.[108] The extent and nature of these differences are not fully characterised.[31] [107] [108] Differences in socialization of males and females may decrease or increase the size of sex differences.[i] [2] [6]

Neuroscience [edit]

A 2021 meta-synthesis of existing literature found that sex accounted for i% of the brain's structure or laterality, finding large group-level differences simply in total brain volume.[109] This partially contradicts a review from 2006 and a meta-assay from 2014 which establish that some show from brain morphology and function studies indicates that male and female brains cannot always be assumed to be identical from either a structural or functional perspective, and some encephalon structures are sexually dimorphic.[110] [111]

Culture [edit]

[edit]

Differences in socialization of males and females are known to crusade, decrease, or increase the magnitude of various sexual practice differences.[ane] [two]

In about cultures, humans are subject field from infancy to gender socialization. For example, baby girls typically wearable pink and infant boys typically wear bluish. Gender schemas, or gendered cultural ideals which determine a person's preferences, are as well installed into our behaviors beginning at infancy.[112]

As people get older, gender stereotypes become more than practical. The social role theory primarily deals with such stereotypes, more specifically the division of labor and a gender hierarchy. When this theory is applied in social settings, such as the workplace, it can oft lead to sexism. This theory also applies to sure personality trails, such as men are more typically more than assertive and women more than passive. According to this theory, ideally, in most cultures, the woman is to stay and tend to the house and home while the man works to both better the business firm itself and increase finances.[113]

In the midst of and then many idealistic concepts on the roles of a specific gender in social club, at that place are as well individuals who choose to not to conform to the ideas of their civilisation. Throughout history, gender roles have been altered and are much more flexible than they were in recent centuries. Such alterations include equal political rights also equally employment and education opportunities solely bachelor to females. Homosexual people are besides discipline to get confronting gender conformities. The term congenital gender invert is used to define homosexuals who possess a trait of the reverse sexual practice. Such individuals tend to have the near social difficulty in regards to cultural norms.[114]

Evolutionary production [edit]

Donald Symons has argued that key sexual practice differences in genetics, hormones and brain structure and function may manifest as distal cultural phenomena (e.chiliad., males as main combatants in warfare, the primarily female readership of romance novels, etc.).[115] There has been significant feminist critique of these and other evolutionary psychology arguments, from both within and exterior of the scientific customs.[116]

See besides [edit]

  • Feminization (sociology)
  • Feminine psychology

References [edit]

  1. ^ a b c d Lippa, Richard (2005). Gender, Nature, and Nurture (2nd ed.). Psychology Printing. ISBN978-0-8058-5345-2. OCLC 60337744. [ page needed ]
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h Halpern, Diane F. (2012). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (4 ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN9781848729414.
  3. ^ Richardson, S.S. (2013). Sex Itself: The Search for Male person and Female in the Homo Genome. Chicago, Usa: University of Chicago Press. ISBN978-0-226-08471-8 . Retrieved 2021-12-29 . [ folio needed ]
  4. ^ Becker, J.B., Berkley, K. J., Geary, N., & Hampson, Due east. (2007) Sex activity Differences in the Brain: From Genes to Behavior. NY: Oxford Academy Press.[ page needed ]
  5. ^ Helmuth, Northward. (1994). Hormones, Sexual practice, and Gild. NY: Praeger.[ folio needed ]
  6. ^ a b c d Geary, David C. (1998). Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences. American Psychological Association. ISBN978-1-55798-527-9. [ page needed ]
  7. ^ Mealey, L. (2000). Sex differences. NY: Bookish Printing.[ page needed ]
  8. ^ Buss, D.M. (2009). Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind. Pearson/Allyn and Salary. ISBN978-0-205-69439-6.
  9. ^ Roscoe, Will (2000). Changing ones: tertiary and fourth genders in Native North America. New York: St. Martin'due south Griffin. ISBN0-312-22479-six. OCLC 44754662.
  10. ^ Martin, G. Kay and Voorhies, Barbara (1975). Supernumerary Sexes, affiliate 4 of Female of the Species (New York: Columbia University Press, 1975).
  11. ^ Miller, Geoffrey (2001). The mating heed: how sexual choice shaped the development of human being nature. New York: Anchor Books. ISBN0-385-49517-X. OCLC 47923735.
  12. ^ a b Zosuls, Kristina M.; Miller, Cindy Faith; Ruble, Diane North.; Martin, Carol Lynn; Fabes, Richard A. (2011-02-09). "Gender Development Research in Sex Roles: Historical Trends and Hereafter Directions". Sex activity Roles. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. 64 (11–12): 826–842. doi:ten.1007/s11199-010-9902-three. ISSN 0360-0025. PMC3131694. PMID 21747580.
  13. ^ Dow, Bonnie J., & Wood, J.(Eds.). (2006). Introduction. In The SAGE Handbook of Gender and Communication. One thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  14. ^ Colapinto, John. 'The True Story of John/Joan'. The Rolling Stone, Dec 11, 1997, pp. 54-97.
  15. ^ a b Costa, Paul, Jr.; Terracciano, Antonio; McCrae, Robert R. (2001). "Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings". Periodical of Personality and Social Psychology (Secondary assay). 81 (2): 322–31. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.ii.322. PMID 11519935.
  16. ^ Hyde, Janet Shibley (September 2005). "The gender similarities hypothesis". American Psychologist. 60 (6): 581–592. CiteSeerX10.1.one.374.1723. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.sixty.six.581. PMID 16173891.
  17. ^ a b c d Schmitt, David P.; Realo, Anu; Voracek, Martin; Allik, Jüri (2008). "Why can't a homo be more like a adult female? Sex activity differences in Large V personality traits across 55 cultures". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (Big-scale research). 94 (1): 168–82. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.168. PMID 18179326.
  18. ^ Christie, R. & Geis, F. (1970) "Studies in Machiavellianism". NY: Academic Press.[ page needed ]
  19. ^ a b c Grijalva, Emily; Newman, Daniel A.; Tay, Louis; Donnellan, M. Brent; Harms, P. D.; Robins, Richard West.; Yan, Taiyi (March 2015). "Gender differences in narcissism: A meta-analytic review". Psychological Bulletin (Meta-assay). 141 (2): 261–310. doi:10.1037/a0038231. PMID 25546498.
  20. ^ Feingold, Alan (1994). "Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis". Psychological Message (Meta-assay). 116 (3): 429–456. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.iii.429. PMID 7809307.
  21. ^ Su, Rong; Rounds, James; Armstrong, Patrick Ian (November 2009). "Men and things, women and people: A meta-analysis of sexual activity differences in interests". Psychological Message (Meta-analysis). 135 (half dozen): 859–884. doi:ten.1037/a0017364. PMID 19883140.
  22. ^ a b c d Niedenthal, Paula; Silvia, Krauth-Gruber; Ric, François (2006). Psychology of emotion: interpersonal, experiential, and cognitive approaches. Principles of Social Psychology. New York: Psychology Press. ISBNone-84169-402-9. OCLC 64208312.
  23. ^ Hatfield, Elaine; Cacioppo, John T.; Rapson, Richard L. (1993). "Emotional Contagion". Current Directions in Psychological Science. SAGE Publications. 2 (three): 96–100. doi:ten.1111/1467-8721.ep10770953. ISSN 0963-7214. S2CID 220533081.
  24. ^ Reeves, Jamie Lawson (18 June 1998). "Women more likely than men to put emotions in motion". Vanderbilt News. Nashville. Archived from the original on 2012-07-24. Retrieved iii April 2008.
  25. ^ Forest, Samuel; Wood, Ellen; Boyd, Denise (2005). The World of Psychology (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. ISBN0-205-36137-4. OCLC 53987049.
  26. ^ a b c d eastward f chiliad h Christov-Moore, Leonardo; Simpson, Elizabeth A.; Coudé, Gino; Grigaityte, Kristina; Iacoboni, Marco; Ferrari, Pier Francesco (October 2014). "Empathy: Gender effects in brain and beliefs". Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (Review). 46: 604–627. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.001. PMC5110041. PMID 25236781.
  27. ^ Hall, Judith A. (1978). "Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues". Psychological Message (Systematic review). 85 (4): 845–857. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.85.4.845.
  28. ^ Hall, Judith A. (1984). Nonverbal Sex Differences: Advice Accuracy and Expressive Style (Review). Johns Hopkins Academy Printing. p. 207. ISBN978-0-8018-2440-one . Retrieved 2021-12-29 .
  29. ^ Hall, Judith A.; Carter, Jason D.; Horgan, Terrence G. (2000). "Gender differences in nonverbal communication of emotion". In Fischer, Agneta H. (ed.). Gender and Emotion: Social Psychological Perspectives (Book affiliate). Studies in Emotion and Social Interaction. Cambridge University Press. pp. 97–117. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511628191.006. ISBN978-0-521-63015-3 . Retrieved 2021-12-29 .
  30. ^ Fischer, Agneta H.; Manstead, Antony S. R. (2000). "The relation betwixt gender and emotion in different cultures". In Fischer, Agneta H. (ed.). Gender and Emotion: Social Psychological Perspectives (Book chapter). Studies in Emotion and Social Interaction. Cambridge University Press. pp. 71–94. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511628191.005. ISBN978-0-521-63986-6 . Retrieved 2021-12-29 .
  31. ^ a b c d Fine, Cordelia (2010). Delusions of Gender: How Our Minds, Order, and Neurosexism Create Difference. Due west. W. Norton. ISBN978-0393068382.
  32. ^ Ickes, W. (1997). Empathic accuracy. New York: The Guilford Printing.[ page needed ]
  33. ^ a b Kret, Thou. E.; De Gelder, B. (ane June 2012). "A review on sex differences in processing emotional signals". Neuropsychologia. 50 (seven): 1211–1221. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.12.022. PMID 22245006. S2CID 11695245.
  34. ^ Kirkland, R. A.; Peterson, E.; Baker, C. A.; Miller, S.; Pulos, S. (2013). "Meta-analysis reveals adult female superiority in 'Reading the Mind in the Optics' Examination". Northward American Journal of Psychology. 15 (1): 121–146.
  35. ^ Thompson, Ashley E.; Voyer, Daniel (iii Oct 2014). "Sex differences in the power to recognise non-verbal displays of emotion: A meta-analysis". Cognition and Emotion. 28 (vii): 1164–1195. doi:10.1080/02699931.2013.875889. PMID 24400860. S2CID 5402395.
  36. ^ Christov-Moore, Leonardo (2014). "Empathy: Gender effects in encephalon and behavior". Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (Review). 46: 604–627. doi:x.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.001. PMC5110041. PMID 25236781.
  37. ^ Chrisler, Joan C; Donald R. McCreary (11 February 2012). Handbook of Gender Research in Psychology. Springer, 2010. ISBN9781441914644. [ folio needed ]
  38. ^ Bettencourt, B. Ann; Miller, Norman (1996). "Gender differences in aggression as a function of provocation: A meta-analysis". Psychological Bulletin. 119 (iii): 422–47. CiteSeerX10.1.1.476.1949. doi:ten.1037/0033-2909.119.3.422. PMID 8668747.
  39. ^ a b c Del Giudice, Marco (2015). "Gender Differences in Personality and Social Behavior". International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. pp. 750–756. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.25100-3. ISBN978-0-08-097087-5.
  40. ^ Card, Noel A.; Stucky, Brian D.; Sawalani, Gita G.; Little, Todd D. (September 2008). "Direct and Indirect Aggression During Childhood and Adolescence: A Meta-Analytic Review of Gender Differences, Intercorrelations, and Relations to Maladjustment". Child Development. 79 (5): 1185–1229. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01184.ten. PMID 18826521.
  41. ^ Campbell, Anne (2007-04-05). "Sex differences in aggression". In Barrett, Louise; Dunbar, Robin (eds.). Oxford Handbooks Online. Oxford Academy Press. doi:x.1093/oxfordhb/9780198568308.013.0025.
  42. ^ a b Barlett, Christopher; Coyne, Sarah Grand. (September 2014). "A meta-analysis of sex differences in cyber-bullying beliefs: The moderating role of age: Sex Differences in Cyber-Bullying". Aggressive Beliefs (Meta-analysis). 40 (5): 474–488. doi:10.1002/ab.21555. PMID 25098968.
  43. ^ Baron, Robert A., Deborah R. Richardson, Human Aggression: Perspectives in Social Psychology, Springer, 2004, ISBN 0-306-48434-10, 9780306484346[ folio needed ]
  44. ^ Albert, D.J.; Walsh, 1000.L.; Jonik, R.H. (1993). "Aggression in humans: What is its biological foundation?". Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (Review). 17 (4): 405–25. doi:ten.1016/S0149-7634(05)80117-iv. PMID 8309650. S2CID 28557481.
  45. ^ Hillbrand, Marc; Pallone, Nathaniel J, eds. (1994). The psychobiology of assailment: engines, measurement, command. Haworth Printing. ISBN978-ane-56024-715-9. OCLC 605125583. [ page needed ]
  46. ^ Handbook of Crime Correlates; Lee Ellis, Kevin Grand. Beaver, John Wright; 2009; Academic Press[ page needed ]
  47. ^ Puts, David A. (2010). "Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual option in humans". Evolution and Homo Beliefs. 31 (3): 157–175. doi:ten.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.02.005.
  48. ^ Jaffee, Sara; Hyde, Janet Shibley (2000). "Gender differences in moral orientation: A meta-analysis". Psychological Bulletin (Meta-analysis). 126 (5): 703–726. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.703. PMID 10989620.
  49. ^ Friesdorf, Rebecca; Conway, Paul; Gawronski, Bertram (May 2015). "Gender Differences in Responses to Moral Dilemmas: A Procedure Dissociation Analysis". Personality and Social Psychology Message (Meta-analysis). 41 (5): 696–713. doi:10.1177/0146167215575731. PMID 25840987. S2CID 206445474.
  50. ^ Yous, Di; Maeda, Yukiko; Bebeau, Muriel J. (2011). "Gender Differences in Moral Sensitivity: A Meta-Analysis". Ethics & Behavior (Meta-analysis). 21 (4): 263–282. doi:10.1080/10508422.2011.585591. S2CID 143045744. Retrieved 18 Dec 2015.
  51. ^ a b Atari, Mohammad; Lai, Marking H. C.; Dehghani, Morteza (28 October 2020). "Sex differences in moral judgements across 67 countries". Proceedings of the Royal Order B: Biological Sciences (Big-scale international enquiry). 287 (1937): 20201201. doi:ten.1098/rspb.2020.1201. PMC7661301. PMID 33081618. S2CID 224805138.
  52. ^ a b Wittig, Grand.A.; Petersen, A.C. (1979). Sex-related Differences in Cerebral Performance: Developmental Issues. Bookish Press series in cognition and perception. Academic Press. ISBN978-0-12-761150-1.
  53. ^ a b c d e f grand Kimura, Doreen (1999). Sex and cognition. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Printing. ISBN978-0-262-11236-ix. OCLC 42856228.
  54. ^ a b c Roivainen, Eka (2011). "Gender differences in processing speed: A review of recent research". Learning and Individual Differences. 21 (2): 145–149. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.021.
  55. ^ a b Li, Rena (one September 2014). "Why women see differently from the way men see? A review of sex differences in cognition and sports". Journal of Sport and Health Science (Review). three (3): 155–162. doi:10.1016/j.jshs.2014.03.012. PMC4266559. PMID 25520851.
  56. ^ a b Wallentin M (March 2009). "Putative sex activity differences in verbal abilities and language cortex: a critical review". Brain and Language. 108 (3): 175–83. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2008.07.001. PMID 18722007. S2CID 9898786.
  57. ^ Miller DI, Halpern DF (January 2014). "The new science of cognitive sexual practice differences". Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 18 (ane): 37–45. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.10.011. PMID 24246136. S2CID 4070016.
  58. ^ Feingold, Allen. (Jump, 1992). Sex activity Differences in Variability in Intellectual Abilities: A New Look at an Old Controversy. Review of Educational Inquiry, 62, 61-84.
  59. ^ a b Neisser, Ulric; Boodoo, Gwyneth; Bouchard, Thomas J.; Boykin, A. Wade; Brody, Nathan; Ceci, Stephen J.; Halpern, Diane F.; Loehlin, John C.; Perloff, Robert; Sternberg, Robert J.; Urbina, Susana (February 1996). Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist (Taskforce written report). Vol. 51. pp. 77–101. CiteSeerX10.1.1.322.5525. doi:ten.1037/0003-066X.51.2.77.
  60. ^ Baumeister, Roy F (2001). Social psychology and human being sexuality: essential readings. Psychology Press. ISBN978-1-84169-019-3. [ page needed ]
  61. ^ Baumeister, Roy F. (2010). Is There Annihilation Good About Men?: How Cultures Flourish By Exploiting Men. Oxford Academy Press. ISBN978-0-19-537410-0. [ page needed ]
  62. ^ Hedges, L.; Nowell, A (1995). "Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals". Scientific discipline. 269 (5220): 41–five. Bibcode:1995Sci...269...41H. doi:10.1126/science.7604277. PMID 7604277.
  63. ^ Stewart, R., Wright, B., Smith, L., Roberts, Southward., & Russell, North. (2021, April 13). Gendered stereotypes and norms: A systematic review of interventions designed to shift attitudes and behaviour. Heliyon. Retrieved May 3, 2022, from https://world wide web.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8066375/
  64. ^ a b c Nisbett, Richard E.; Aronson, Joshua; Blair, Clancy; Dickens, William; Flynn, James; Halpern, Diane F.; Turkheimer, Eric (February 2012). "Intelligence: New findings and theoretical developments". American Psychologist (Review). 67 (2): 130–159. doi:10.1037/a0026699. PMID 22233090.
  65. ^ Hyde, Janet Shibley (2006). "Women in Science and Mathematics: Gender Similarities in Abilities and Sociocultural Forces". Biological, Social, and Organizational Components of Success for Women in Academic Science and Applied science. National Academies Press.
  66. ^ Terlecki, Melissa Southward.; Newcombe, Nora S. (September 2005). "How Important Is the Digital Divide? The Relation of Calculator and Videogame Usage to Gender Differences in Mental Rotation Ability". Sex activity Roles. 53 (5–6): 433–441. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-6765-0. S2CID 144263258.
  67. ^ Cherney, Isabelle D. (Dec 2008). "Mom, Let Me Play More than Estimator Games: They Improve My Mental Rotation Skills". Sex Roles. 59 (xi–12): 776–786. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9498-z. S2CID 10166843.
  68. ^ Feng, Jing; Spence, Ian; Pratt, Jay (October 2007). "Playing an Action Video Game Reduces Gender Differences in Spatial Cognition". Psychological Science. xviii (10): 850–855. doi:x.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01990.ten. PMID 17894600. S2CID 5885796.
  69. ^ Ellis, Lee, Sex differences: summarizing more than a century of scientific research, CRC Press, 2008, ISBN 0-8058-5959-4, ISBN 978-0-8058-5959-ane[ page needed ]
  70. ^ Cross, Catharine P.; Copping, Lee T.; Campbell, Anne (January 2011). "Sex differences in impulsivity: A meta-analysis" (PDF). Psychological Bulletin (Meta-assay). 137 (1): 97–130. doi:x.1037/a0021591. PMID 21219058. S2CID 25988737.
  71. ^ Weafer, J.; De Wit, H. (2013). "Sex differences in impulsive action and impulsive choice". Addictive Behaviors (Review). 39 (xi): 1573–1579. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.ten.033. PMC4012004. PMID 24286704.
  72. ^ Hardy, Louise L.; Male monarch, Lesley; Farrell, Louise; Macniven, Rona; Howlett, Sarah (2010-09-01). "Primal movement skills among Australian preschool children". Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 13 (5): 503–508. doi:ten.1016/j.jsams.2009.05.010. ISSN 1440-2440. PMID 19850520.
  73. ^ Alexander, Gerianne Thousand.; Wilcox, Teresa; Woods, Rebecca (2009-06-01). "Sex Differences in Infants' Visual Interest in Toys". Archives of Sexual Behavior. 38 (3): 427–433. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9430-1. ISSN 1573-2800. PMID 19016318. S2CID 20435292.
  74. ^ Fabes, Richard A.; Martin, Carol Lynn; Hanish, Laura D. (2003). "Immature Children'south Play Qualities in Aforementioned-, Other-, and Mixed-Sex Peer Groups". Child Evolution. 74 (iii): 921–932. doi:ten.1111/1467-8624.00576. ISSN 0009-3920. JSTOR 3696237. PMID 12795398.
  75. ^ Hines, Melissa; Kaufman, Francine R. (August 1994). "Androgen and the Evolution of Man Sex activity-Typical Beliefs: Rough-and-tumble Play and Sex of Preferred Playmates in Children with Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia (CAH)". Kid Development. 65 (4): 1042–1053. doi:ten.2307/1131303. JSTOR 1131303. PMID 7956464.
  76. ^ Langlois, Judith H.; Downs, A. Chris (December 1980). "Mothers, Fathers, and Peers every bit Socialization Agents of Sexual practice-Typed Play Behaviors in Immature Children". Child Development. 51 (4): 1237. doi:10.2307/1129566. JSTOR 1129566.
  77. ^ a b c d e Oliver, Mary Beth; Hyde, Janet S. (2001). "Gender Differences in Sexuality: A Meta-Assay". In Baumeister, Roy F. (ed.). Social Psychology and Human Sexuality: Essential Readings. Psychology Press. pp. 29–43. ISBN978-ane-84-169019-iii.
  78. ^ Schuett, Wiebke; Tregenza, Tom; Slow, Sasha R. X. (19 August 2009). "Sexual selection and fauna personality". Biological Reviews (Narrative review). 85 (2): 217–246. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00101.x. PMID 19922534. S2CID 205599191.
  79. ^ Buss, David Michael; Schmitt, David P. (2011). "Evolutionary Psychology and Feminism". Sexual practice Roles. 64 (9–10): 768–787. doi:x.1007/s11199-011-9987-3. S2CID 7878675.
  80. ^ Petersen, JL; Hyde, JS (January 2010). "A meta-analytic review of inquiry on gender differences in sexuality, 1993-2007". Psychological Message (Meta-analysis). 136 (1): 21–38. CiteSeerX10.one.1.464.1733. doi:10.1037/a0017504. PMID 20063924.
  81. ^ Forest, Wendy; Kressel, Laura; Joshi, Priyanka D.; Louie, Brian (July 2014). "Meta-Analysis of Menstrual Cycle Furnishings on Women's Mate Preferences". Emotion Review (Meta-analysis). vi (iii): 229–249. doi:10.1177/1754073914523073. S2CID 4641508.
  82. ^ Gildersleeve, Kelly; Haselton, Martie 1000.; Fales, Melissa R. (2014). "Do women's mate preferences change across the ovulatory cycle? A meta-analytic review". Psychological Bulletin (Meta-assay). 140 (5): 1205–1259. doi:10.1037/a0035438. PMID 24564172.
  83. ^ Durante, Kristina Thousand.; Eastwick, Paul W.; Finkel, Eli J.; Gangestad, Steven Westward.; Simpson, Jeffry A. (2016). "Pair-Bonded Relationships and Romantic Alternatives". Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Briefing contribution). Elsevier. 53: 1–74. doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2015.09.001. ISBN978-0-12-804737-8.
  84. ^ Thomas, Andrew Yard.; Armstrong, Stephanie L.; Stewart-Williams, Steve; Jones, Benedict C. (2021). "Current Fertility Status Does Not Predict Sociosexual Attitudes and Desires in Usually Ovulating Women". Evolutionary Psychology. nineteen (i). doi:ten.1177/1474704920976318. PMID 33412934. S2CID 231192372.
  85. ^ Afifi, M (2007). "Gender differences in mental health". Singapore Medical Journal (Review). 48 (5): 385–91. PMID 17453094.
  86. ^ Rosenfield, Sarah. "Gender and mental health: Do women have more than psychopathology, men more, or both the same (and why)?". In Horwitz, Allan V.; Scheid, Teresa L. (eds.). A handbook for the study of mental health: Social contexts, theories, and systems. New York: Cambridge Academy Press. pp. 348–threescore.
  87. ^ Bourdon, Karen H.; Boyd, Jeffrey H.; Rae, Donald S.; Burns, Barbara J.; Thompson, James Westward.; Locke, Ben Z. (1988). "Gender differences in phobias: Results of the ECA community survey". Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 2 (iii): 227–241. doi:ten.1016/0887-6185(88)90004-seven.
  88. ^ Nolen-Hoeksema, Susan (1987). "Sex differences in unipolar depression: Evidence and theory". Psychological Bulletin. 101 (two): 259–82. CiteSeerX10.1.1.321.597. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.259. PMID 3562707.
  89. ^ Bosson, Jennifer K.; Vandello, Joseph A.; Camille E., Buckner (2018). The Psychology of Sex and Gender. Sage Publications. p. 403. ISBN978-1-l-633133-1.
  90. ^ Seeman, Mary (1997). "Psychopathology in Women and Men: Focus on Female Hormones". The American Journal of Psychiatry. 154 (12): 1641–7. doi:x.1176/ajp.154.12.1641. PMID 9396940.
  91. ^ Elsabbagh, Mayada; Divan, Gauri; Koh, Yun-Joo; Kim, Young Shin; Kauchali, Shuaib; Marcín, Carlos; Montiel-Nava, Cecilia; Patel, Vikram; Paula, Cristiane S; Wang, Chongying; Yasamy, Mohammad Taghi (June 2012). "Global Prevalence of Autism and Other Pervasive Developmental Disorders". Autism Enquiry. 5 (3): 160–179. doi:ten.1002/aur.239. ISSN 1939-3792. PMC3763210. PMID 22495912.
  92. ^ CDC (2021-12-02). "Information and Statistics on Autism Spectrum Disorder | CDC". Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Retrieved 2022-02-25 .
  93. ^ Russell, Ginny; Ford, Tamsin; Steer, Colin; Golding, Jean (2010-03-22). "Identification of children with the aforementioned level of impairment as children on the autistic spectrum, and analysis of their service use". Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 51 (6): 643–651. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02233.x. ISSN 0021-9630. PMID 20345841.
  94. ^ Businesswoman-Cohen, Simon (2007). "The evolution of empathizing and systemizing: assortative mating of ii strong systemizers and the cause of autism". In Barrett, Louise; Dunbar, Robin (eds.). Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. doi:ten.1093/oxfordhb/9780198568308.013.0016. ISBN978-0-19-856830-8.
  95. ^ a b Mandy, William; Chilvers, Rebecca; Chowdhury, Uttom; Salter, Gemma; Seigal, Anna; Skuse, David (2012-07-01). "Sex Differences in Autism Spectrum Disorder: Evidence from a Large Sample of Children and Adolescents". Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 42 (7): 1304–1313. doi:10.1007/s10803-011-1356-0. ISSN 1573-3432. PMID 21947663. S2CID 18639019.
  96. ^ Dworzynski, Katharina; Ronald, Angelica; Bolton, Patrick; Happé, Francesca (2012-08-01). "How Unlike Are Girls and Boys Above and Below the Diagnostic Threshold for Autism Spectrum Disorders?". Journal of the American Academy of Child & Boyish Psychiatry. 51 (8): 788–797. doi:ten.1016/j.jaac.2012.05.018. ISSN 0890-8567. PMID 22840550.
  97. ^ Head, Alexandra G; McGillivray, Jane A; Stokes, Mark A (2014-02-28). "Gender differences in emotionality and sociability in children with autism spectrum disorders". Molecular Autism. 5 (1): 19. doi:ten.1186/2040-2392-5-19. ISSN 2040-2392. PMC3945617. PMID 24576331.
  98. ^ Jacquemont, Sébastien; Coe, Bradley P.; Hersch, Micha; Duyzend, Michael H.; Krumm, Niklas; Bergmann, Sven; Beckmann, Jacques S.; Rosenfeld, Jill A.; Eichler, Evan Eastward. (March 2014). "A Higher Mutational Burden in Females Supports a "Female Protective Model" in Neurodevelopmental Disorders". The American Journal of Human being Genetics. 94 (3): 415–425. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.02.001. ISSN 0002-9297. PMC3951938. PMID 24581740.
  99. ^ Schlomer, Gabriel Fifty.; Del Giudice, Marco; Ellis, Bruce J. (2011). "Parent–offspring disharmonize theory: An evolutionary framework for understanding conflict within homo families". Psychological Review. 118 (three): 496–521. doi:ten.1037/a0024043. PMID 21604906.
  100. ^ Badcock, Christopher; Crespi, Bernard (2008). "Battle of the sexes may prepare the brain". Nature. 454 (7208): 1054–v. Bibcode:2008Natur.454.1054B. doi:10.1038/4541054a. PMID 18756240. S2CID 5890859.
  101. ^ Martin, Hale; Finn, Stephen E. Masculinity and Femininity in the MMPI-2 and MMPI-A. University of Minnesota Press. p. fourteen. ISBN978-0-8166-2444-7.
  102. ^ John Bancroft. (2002). Biological factors in human sexuality. Retrieved October 21, 2011, from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2372/is_1_39/ai_87080435/. PMID: 12476251 DOI: ten.1080/00224490209552114
  103. ^ Berenbaum, Sheri A.; Blakemore, Judith E. Owen; Beltz, Adriene Thousand. (2011-05-27). "A Role for Biology in Gender-Related Behavior". Sex Roles. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. 64 (11–12): 804–825. doi:x.1007/s11199-011-9990-8. ISSN 0360-0025. S2CID 145689071.
  104. ^ King, Robert C. (2012). A dictionary of genetics (eighth ed.). Oxford [u.a.]: Oxford Univ. Press. ISBN9780199766444. [ page needed ]
  105. ^ Zirkle, Conrad (1946). "The discovery of sex activity-influenced, sex limited and sexual activity-linked heredity". In Montagu, Ashley (ed.). Studies in the history of science and learning offered in homage to George Sarton on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday. New York: Schuman. pp. 167–194. OCLC 621493829.
  106. ^ a b King R.C; Stansfield Westward.D. & Mulligan P.K. 2006. A dictionary of genetics. 7th ed, Oxford University Printing. ISBN 0-nineteen-530761-5[ page needed ]
  107. ^ a b Sánchez, Francisco J.; Vilain, Eric (2010). "Genes and encephalon sex differences". Sex Differences in the Human being Brain, their Underpinnings and Implications. Progress in Brain Research. Vol. 186. pp. 64–76. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-53630-3.00005-1. ISBN978-0-444-53630-3. PMID 21094886.
  108. ^ a b Margaret G. McCarthy; Anthony P. Auger; Tracy L. Bale; Geert J. De Vries; Gregory A. Dunn; Nancy G. Forger; Elaine K. Murray; Bridget M. Nugent; Jaclyn M. Schwarz; Melinda Eastward. Wilson (14 October 2009). "The Epigenetics of Sex Differences in the Encephalon". J. Neurosci. (Symposium). 29 (41): 12815–12823. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3331-09.2009. PMC2788155. PMID 19828794.
  109. ^ Eliot, Lise; Ahmed, Adnan; Khan, Hiba; Patel, Julie (2021-06-01). "Dump the "dimorphism": Comprehensive synthesis of human encephalon studies reveals few male-female person differences beyond size". Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 125: 667–697. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.02.026. ISSN 0149-7634. PMID 33621637.
  110. ^ Cahill Fifty (June 2006). "Why sex matters for neuroscience". Nature Reviews. Neuroscience. seven (six): 477–84. doi:10.1038/nrn1909. PMID 16688123. S2CID 10847255.
  111. ^ Ruigrok AN, Salimi-Khorshidi Yard, Lai MC, Baron-Cohen S, Lombardo MV, Tait RJ, Suckling J (February 2014). "A meta-analysis of sex differences in man encephalon structure". Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews (Meta-analysis). 39: 34–fifty. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.12.004. PMC3969295. PMID 24374381.
  112. ^ Rudman, L. A., Glick, P. (2008). The social psychology of gender: how power and intimacy shape gender relations. New York: Guilford Press.
  113. ^ Rudman, 50. A., Glick, P. (2008). The social psychology of gender: how ability and intimacy shape gender relations. New York: Guilford Press.
  114. ^ Rudman, L. A., Glick, P. (2008). The social psychology of gender: how power and intimacy shape gender relations. New York: Guilford Press.
  115. ^ Symons, Donald (1979). The Evolution of Homo Sexuality. Oxford New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-19-502907-9. OCLC 729246375. [ page needed ]
  116. ^ Fisher, Maryanne L.; Garcia, Justin R.; Chang, Rosemarie Sokol, eds. (2013-02-27). Evolution's Empress. Oxford Academy Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199892747.001.0001. ISBN978-0-xix-989274-7. [ page needed ]

External links [edit]

  • List of full text books and articles on the topic of psychology of gender

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_differences_in_psychology

Posted by: thomasthadvating.blogspot.com

0 Response to "What Are Some Acquired Traits In Animals"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel